Start a Project
What Does an MVP Cost? What 50,000 to 300,000 RMB Buys

What Does an MVP Cost? What 50,000 to 300,000 RMB Buys

Asking what an MVP costs is really asking how few features are needed to test the assumption behind the product. Once the feature boundary is clear, MVP development cost becomes remarkably stable across vendors. Drawing on recent project records, Juhui Software groups MVP quotes into three tiers. Each tier maps to a different level of feature density and delivery form, so a client can locate their project first and then discuss details.

Tier one: under 50,000 RMB for a single-function loop

What this tier buys is one working path, usually three to five screens. Typical shapes include a form tool that only submits and queries, a light mini program that scans and records, a single internal approval flow, or one data dashboard. The user side may be four screens: login, list, detail and submit. The back office covers viewing data and a simple export.

Labour makes up more than 70 percent of this tier. Visual design lands around 10,000 to 20,000 RMB, testing and integration around 10,000, with the rest going to project management and deployment. This tier cannot absorb payments, revenue splitting or multi-role permissions. Force those in and the project hits the ceiling of the range immediately.

Tier two: 50,000 to 150,000 RMB for one complete business loop

Most MVPs sit here. The pattern is a real user-facing app or mini program, a transaction or order flow, and an admin console that can actually be operated. Examples are a booking-plus-payment service app, or a store system with membership, redemption and simple reporting.

The cost split at this tier is fairly predictable. Product and prototype take 8 to 10 percent, visual design 12 to 15 percent, development 50 to 55 percent, testing and integration about 10 percent, and project management plus deployment 8 to 10 percent. If the MVP also integrates third-party payments, SMS, maps or e-invoicing, API integration typically adds 10,000 to 30,000 RMB, depending on how well documented the other party's interface is and whether qualification filing is required.

Tier three: 150,000 to 300,000 RMB where hardware or multiple systems are involved

At this tier the cost centre moves from screens to systems. Two situations push the budget up. The first is hardware connection: EV chargers, vending cabinets, access control and weighing devices all require device communication protocols, command dispatch, status reporting and exception alerts, and testing needs the physical equipment. The second is integration with an existing ERP, finance or warehouse system, where the other party's pace of cooperation directly affects both schedule and staffing.

Our recommendation at this tier is to cost the hardware integration and the software back office as two separate budgets. On-site debugging usually takes longer than expected, and bundling it into one lump sum makes responsibility very hard to assign when something goes wrong.

Four things not worth paying for at MVP stage

A complete visual system is the first. An MVP needs one usable key visual, not a design manual with multi-platform adaptation. Full reporting is the second: sophisticated analytics belongs in phase two, and validation only needs three to five key metrics. A multi-role permission framework is the third: MVPs rarely have more than two user roles, and button-level permissions are textbook over-engineering. High-concurrency architecture is the fourth: without real traffic, designing for a hundred thousand users only consumes budget.

Cutting these four typically brings an MVP development cost down by about 30 percent with almost no loss of validating power.

The four usual causes of budget overrun

Scope creep ranks first; every small addition during the build compounds. Vague requirements rank second, where the same sentence means two different things to client and developer until the work is done. Underestimated third-party dependencies rank third, where payment merchant accounts, industry qualifications and platform category review consume schedule while the team idles. Missing acceptance criteria rank fourth: without a clear definition of done, delivery turns into endless revision.

How to turn a quote into something executable

Do not send a brief that says only "I want an app". Send three things: one core user flow, a list of must-have features, and a clear validation goal. Then ask what that MVP development cost covers: how many screens, how many APIs, how many revision rounds, what the acceptance standard is, and how out-of-scope work is priced. Put those answers into the contract, and the question of what an MVP costs stops being a vague range and becomes a budget you can actually manage against.